Vancouver Cost and Quantity List vs. Bill of Sale

For a City of Vancouver, Washington project, start by naming the record you need. Vancouver’s Recording Documents page links a public-improvement Cost and Quantity List and a corporation Bill of Sale as separate forms. Use the first to trace a project’s listed quantities and costs. Use the second as a clue to a possible completed conveyance document. Neither blank form tells you that a particular project was accepted or that its permit closed.

If you already hold a dated project document, write down its exact title and identifiers before asking for another copy. An engineering project number can help connect papers, but it is not a County Auditor recording number by itself.

When the missing paper is the cost worksheet

The linked Cost and Quantity List asks for a project name, contractor, location, engineering number and date. Its rows organize public-improvement work by system, with quantities, units and cost entries. The current City index labels the linked template revised February 5, 2026. That label identifies the template offered now; it does not date a reader’s completed project worksheet.

For a missing project-specific copy, describe the work and the period shown in the papers you have. Ask for the completed worksheet or a particular attachment, not for a generic form you can already download. Compare the engineering number and project name across versions. If your folder contains an estimate and a later worksheet, keep those dates separate from any inspection record. A quantity entry states what the worksheet records; it does not establish that an inspector saw that quantity in place.

Use a four-line note to prevent one reference from silently replacing another:

  1. Project identity: Name, location, known engineering number and approximate document date from your own file.
  2. Worksheet: Exact title, version date if shown, and the line or attachment whose quantity or cost you need to understand.
  3. Conveyance paper: Bill of Sale title, named parties, execution date and description only if a completed copy actually shows them.
  4. Recording: Auditor instrument reference and recording date only if independently shown or confirmed; otherwise mark them unknown.

The note is an organizing aid, not a City search form. No public address, parcel number or engineering-number search was run for this article, and those clues are not verified fields in a live City or County lookup.

When the missing paper is a Bill of Sale

The City’s linked corporation Bill of Sale is a blank grantor-to-City form with project, description, execution and notary spaces. Its blank description identifies no project items. The template establishes no completed transfer, City acceptance or current ownership.

Ask first whether the copy in your folder is merely the template, a partly filled draft or an executed document. Copy the parties and document date from the actual paper if present. If its description refers to another schedule, request that identified attachment too. A signature page without the referenced description leaves the subject of the document unclear; a matching project number alone does not fill that gap. Keep the completed paper’s own wording separate from what the cost worksheet lists.

Consider a fictional project called Cedar Bend. Its cost worksheet bears engineering number ENG-123, while an unsigned Bill of Sale draft bears ENG-124. The similar project name would not make those versions a match. A useful next inquiry names both numbers, asks whether a completed document for ENG-123 exists, and asks for the referenced description. The example does not imply either fictional paper was recorded or accepted.

Ask the office that could hold the missing copy

For an existing City-held worksheet, completed Bill of Sale or separate acceptance record if one exists, use the City’s public-records request guidance. It describes request routes and asks for an adequate description of existing records. State the project name, known engineering number, location, approximate period, document title and precisely which version or attachment is missing. The City lists 360-487-8480 and citypdr@cityofvancouver.us for records questions. This general route does not guarantee that a particular file is held, releasable or available as a copy.

For an instrument that was actually recorded, follow the Clark County Auditor’s document-copy instructions. The Auditor describes online, mail and in-person copy routes. Give the actual instrument reference if you have it; otherwise ask how to identify the recorded document from the parties, title and approximate date on your paper. The City’s form title or engineering number is not a verified Auditor instrument number. No Auditor index or project-specific recording was checked here.

The City index lists recording-document forms, but it does not establish a universal order of worksheet preparation, execution, recording, inspection and City acceptance. If your real question is whether work was accepted, ask for the named decision or related existing file rather than treating either form as that decision. The Vancouver stormwater inspection-record guide covers a different private-facility maintenance trail.

A filled worksheet or Bill of Sale does not prove a building permit was issued, an inspection passed, the City accepted the work, final permit closure occurred, or occupancy was authorized. For that different question, the final-inspection status guide follows the exact permit and inspection record. The City and Auditor pages were checked October 8, 2026 UTC. The retained cost-template text and the City-linked corporation form were read in full; no project, property, permit, City request or recorded instrument was searched. Online coverage dates, retention and availability of an older copy remain unverified. An empty search or missing copy leaves that record unresolved; it does not prove the work was unpermitted.